Management of red drum in a Texas estuary - a case study.

dc.acquisition-srcen_US
dc.call-noAcc# 3082en_US
dc.contract-noen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatlock, G.C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, P.L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBreuer, J.P.en_US
dc.contributor.otherProceedings of the Thirty-third Annual Conference, Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, October 21-24, 1979, Hot Springs, Arkansas.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-15T17:00:18Z
dc.date.available2010-02-15T17:00:18Z
dc.date.issued1978en_US
dc.degreeen_US
dc.descriptionp. 442-450.en_US
dc.description-otheren_US
dc.description.abstractIn September 1974 the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission banned the use of plastic baits on trotlines because these baits were thought to be selective for small (<500 mm) red drum (Sciaenops ocellata). The size of red drum landed by commercial fishermen before (1972-1974) and after (1974-1978) the ban was compared with the size of fish collected during Texas Parks and Wildlife Department trammel net surveys in order to determine whether the ban had any effect on either the commercial catch or fish availability. Fish landed by commercial fishermen were significantly larger after the ban than before; therefore, it appears that elastic baits are selective for small red drum and that the ban resulted in the desired effect. The larger red drum in the commercial landings as compared with trammel net caught fish may have resulted from such factors as fishing method (hook size and bait type), fishing location and/or culling. The reason for the increase in size of trammel net caught red drum after the ban is not clear but may involve a complex series of effects such as year class success, changes in recreational fishing pressure or general decrease in commercial harvest. While this study does not prove conclusively that the ban on plastic baits altered the size composition of commercially harvested red drum, it does indicate that the desired result was achieved. Studies of the effects of management regulations of fish populations are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of such regulations.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://gbic.tamug.edu/request.htmen_US
dc.geo-codeTexas coasten_US
dc.historyen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.3/20890
dc.latitudeen_US
dc.locationGalveston Bay Collection; TAMUG periodical collectionen_US
dc.longitudeen_US
dc.notesen_US
dc.placeen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries3082.00en_US
dc.relation.urien_US
dc.scaleen_US
dc.seriesen_US
dc.subjectred drumen_US
dc.subjectSciaenops ocellataen_US
dc.subjectfishery managementen_US
dc.subjectbaiten_US
dc.subjectcommercial speciesen_US
dc.subjectcommercial fishingen_US
dc.subjectsize distributionen_US
dc.subjectmanagementen_US
dc.subjectfishing gearen_US
dc.titleManagement of red drum in a Texas estuary - a case study.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.universityen_US
dc.vol-issue33en_US

Files