Evaluation of alternative oil spill cleanup techniques in a Spartina alterniflora salt marsh.

dc.acquisition-srcen_US
dc.call-noAcc# 4195en_US
dc.contract-noen_US
dc.contributor.authorKiesling, R.W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, S.K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWebb, J.W.en_US
dc.contributor.otherEnvironmental Pollution.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-15T17:07:15Z
dc.date.available2010-02-15T17:07:15Z
dc.date.issued1988en_US
dc.degreeen_US
dc.descriptionp. 221-238.en_US
dc.description-otheren_US
dc.description.abstractThree oil spill situations which cause long-term impact were simulated in 1m2 salt marsh plots to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative cleanup techniques at removing oil and reducing damage to Spartina alterniflora. Cleanup techniques, implemented 18-24h after oiling, were not effective at removing oil after sediment penetration. When oil remained on the sediment surface, flushing techniques were most effective at removal, reducing levels of added oil by 73% to 83%. The addition of dispersant to the flushing stream only slightly enhanced oil removal. Clipping of vegetation followed by sorbent pad application to sediment was moderately effective, reducing added oil by 36% to 44%. In contrast to flushing and clipping, burning increased the amount of oil in sediment by 27% to 72%. Although flushing and clipping were effective at oil removal, neither technique reduced initial damage to plants or enhanced long-term recovery. While flushed plots sustained no additional plant damage. Based on these results, first consideration should be given to natural tidal flushing as the means to remove oil, especially in salt marshes subject to ample tidal inundation. Although our results do not support cleanup in salt marshes with ample tidal inundation, low pressure flusing may be warranted when fuel oils or large quantities of crude oil impact salt marshes subject to reduced tidal flushing. Flushing, when warranted, should be initiated prior to oil penetration into the substrate. Clipping may be considered as a cleanup response only when heavy oil cannot be effectively removed from vegetation by flushing. Burning is not recommended because it enhances oil penetration into sediment and causes substantial initial plant damage.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://gbic.tamug.edu/request.htmen_US
dc.geo-codePelican Islanden_US
dc.geo-codeGalveston Bayen_US
dc.historyen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.3/22009
dc.latitudeen_US
dc.locationGBIC Collectionen_US
dc.longitudeen_US
dc.notesen_US
dc.placeen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries4195.00en_US
dc.relation.urien_US
dc.scaleen_US
dc.seriesen_US
dc.subjectmarshesen_US
dc.subjectSpartina alternifloraen_US
dc.subjectoil removalen_US
dc.subjectoil spillsen_US
dc.subjectflushingen_US
dc.subjectcleaningen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of alternative oil spill cleanup techniques in a Spartina alterniflora salt marsh.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.universityen_US
dc.vol-issue55en_US

Files