The status and distribution of the red wolf.

Simple item page
dc.acquisition-srcen_US
dc.call-noen_US
dc.contract-noen_US
dc.contributor.authorPimlott, D.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJoslin, P.W.en_US
dc.contributor.otherTransactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conferencesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-15T16:48:58Z
dc.date.available2010-02-15T16:48:58Z
dc.date.issued1968en_US
dc.degreeen_US
dc.descriptionp. 373-384.en_US
dc.description-otheren_US
dc.description.abstractThe foregoing review has brought out that as late as this decade there has been a great deal of confusion about the status of the red wolf. The taxonomic study by McCarley (1962) suggested that red wolves had been replaced by coyotes and by red wolf x coyote hybrids in most areas in eastern Texas, Arkansas, and Oklahoma. His work indicated that a few might still exist in parts of Louisiana. McCarley's conclusions were not widely known, and two reports which suggested that there were still many red wolves were published in 1964.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://gbic.tamug.edu/request.htmen_US
dc.geo-codeTexas coasten_US
dc.historyen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.3/18980
dc.latitudeen_US
dc.locationNOT AVAILABLE IN-HOUSE.en_US
dc.longitudeen_US
dc.notesen_US
dc.placeen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries1238.00en_US
dc.relation.urien_US
dc.scaleen_US
dc.seriesen_US
dc.subjectred wolfen_US
dc.subjectecological distributionen_US
dc.subjectdistribution recordsen_US
dc.subjectrare speciesen_US
dc.subjectendangered speciesen_US
dc.subjecttaxonomyen_US
dc.subjecthybridizationen_US
dc.titleThe status and distribution of the red wolf.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.universityen_US
dc.vol-issue33en_US

Files

Collections

Galveston Bay Bibliography
GBIC Abstracts (full text not available through Jack K. Williams Library)