Comparison of Warburg and Marais methods of determining oxygen uptake rate constants

Simple item page
dc.acquisition-srcDownloaded from-Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstractsen_US
dc.call-noen_US
dc.contract-noen_US
dc.contributor.authorHung YTen_US
dc.contributor.authorEckenfeld WWJen_US
dc.contributor.otherWater Pollut Control Vol 114, no 2, pp 6-9 + 25 1976en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-15T17:13:23Z
dc.date.available2010-02-15T17:13:23Z
dc.date.issued1976en_US
dc.degreeen_US
dc.description6-9en_US
dc.description-otheren_US
dc.description.abstract(1) In this study the O Sub(2) uptake rate constant for the Houston Ship Channel waters was found to vary from 0.027 to 0.14 day Super(-1) with an average value of 0.092 day Super(-1) by the Marais method. (2) The correlations between results of k and L values obtained by the Warburg method and the Marais method were poor. (3) The Marais method is more suitable than the Warburg method for the determination of k values in the low oxygen uptake rate water, such as in the case of the Houston Ship Channel watersen_US
dc.description.urihttp://gbic.tamug.edu/request.htmen_US
dc.historyen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.3/22925
dc.latitudeen_US
dc.locationen_US
dc.longitudeen_US
dc.notesRecords keyed from 1976 ASFA printed journalsEnglishEnglishJournal ArticleMarine; Brackish; Freshwater1976en_US
dc.placeen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries50390.00en_US
dc.relation.urien_US
dc.scaleen_US
dc.seriesen_US
dc.subjectOxygenen_US
dc.subjectPollution controlen_US
dc.subjectQ5 01503 Characteristics,behavior and fateen_US
dc.subjectUSAen_US
dc.subjectWater analysisen_US
dc.titleComparison of Warburg and Marais methods of determining oxygen uptake rate constantsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
dc.universityen_US
dc.vol-issue(2)en_US

Files

Collections

Galveston Bay Bibliography
GBIC Abstracts (full text not available through Jack K. Williams Library)