Comparison of benthic sampling procedures: Petersen Grab vs Mackin Corer.

Simple item page
dc.acquisition-srcen_US
dc.call-noen_US
dc.contract-noen_US
dc.contributor.authorBaker, J.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKimball, K.T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBedinger, C.A., Jr.en_US
dc.contributor.otherWater Resourcesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-15T17:00:19Z
dc.date.available2010-02-15T17:00:19Z
dc.date.issued1977en_US
dc.degreeen_US
dc.descriptionp. 597-601.en_US
dc.description-otheren_US
dc.description.abstractThirty-five stations in a shallow (mixo)mesohaline estuary, Trinity Bay, Texas, were sampled, in replicate, once each month for 3 months. Sorted taxa were ranked by percent occurrence and mean abundance and the top 5 representative taxa were compared. Frequency of occurrence or mean abundance indicated no major difference between the major taxa collected by the Mackin Corer and the Petersen grab. Single classification analysis of variance indicated that the Mackin Corer regularly collected higher mean densities of the most common taxa with more precise estimates of these same densities.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://gbic.tamug.edu/request.htmen_US
dc.geo-codeTrinity Bayen_US
dc.historyen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.3/20894
dc.latitudeen_US
dc.locationNOT AVAILABLE IN-HOUSE.en_US
dc.longitudeen_US
dc.notesen_US
dc.placeen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries3086.00en_US
dc.relation.urien_US
dc.scaleen_US
dc.seriesen_US
dc.subjectabundanceen_US
dc.subjecttaxaen_US
dc.subjectdensityen_US
dc.subjectestuariesen_US
dc.subjectsamplingen_US
dc.subjectcoringen_US
dc.subjectcoresen_US
dc.subjectcore analysisen_US
dc.titleComparison of benthic sampling procedures: Petersen Grab vs Mackin Corer.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.universityen_US
dc.vol-issue11(7)en_US

Files

Collections

Galveston Bay Bibliography
GBIC Abstracts (full text not available through Jack K. Williams Library)