Fish tagging in Texas Bays during November 1975- September 1976

dc.acquisition-srcen_US
dc.call-noSH 328 .M35 no. 1 GBAYen_US
dc.contract-noen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatlock, G.C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWeaver, J.E.en_US
dc.contributor.otheren_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-15T16:55:22Z
dc.date.available2010-02-15T16:55:22Z
dc.date.issued1979en_US
dc.degreeen_US
dc.description135 pgs.en_US
dc.description-otheren_US
dc.description.abstractDuring November 1975 - September 1976, 3730 fish representing 13 species were tagged with internal abdominal tags along the Texas coast. Most fish (95.4%) were tagged from November through May. Red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) and black drum (Pogonias cromis) were the predominant species tagged (2913 fish). Of the 13 species tagged, recaptures of seven species were reported. Red drum had the largest percent recaptures with 11.6% followed by gulf flounder (Paralichthys albigutta) (9.3%), Atlantic croaker (Micropogon undulatus) (4.0%), southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma) (4.5%), black drum (3.4%), sheepshead (Archosargus probatocephalus) (2.9%) and spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) (2.3%). Sport fisherman reported catching 132 tagged fish; commercial fishermen reported 82. Experimental sampling by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department resulted in 12 fish and unknown fishermen reported 10. Tagged fish were returned during all months with the majority (72.9%) being returned after March. Rewards paid during this study totaled $518. Most of the recaptured red drum (68.6%) and black drum (67.3%) traveled < 10 km from the tagging site. No apparent relationship existed between time free and distance traveled for either species. This pattern was consistent in all bays except upper and lower Laguna Madre where the majority (> 50.0%) traveled > 10 km. The percent of red drum and black drum recaptured decreased as the distance from the tagging site increased. The relationships can be expressed in the forms: Red drum Y= 2.68 - 1.42X Black drum Y= 2.51 - 1.33X where Y= log percent and X= log distance (upper limit of each 5 km increment). Only 12 (7.5%) of the recaptured red drum and one (1.9%) of the recaptured black drum left the bay system where tagged. A lack of extensive mass migration by red drum and black drum indicates that each bay system on the Texas coast can be considered a closed system for these two species. Variation associated with the mean weight growth rate obtained from recapture data was much greater than that associated with the mean length growth rate. Therefore, length should be used as a basis for expressing growth rate. Annual mean growth rates of recaptured red drum in Texas bays ranged from 0.30 +/- 0.11 mm/day in the Corpus Christi Bay system to 0.85 +/-0.47 mm/day in the Galveston Bay system. Mean growth rates in each bay system were not significantly different from each other (F= 1.14; df= 6, 103; P > 0.05). The mean growth rate for all recaptured red drum was 0.43 +/- 0.08 mm/day. Size at tagging did not relate to growth rate. Annual mean growth rates of recaptured black drum in Texas bays ranged from - 0.90 +/- 0.00 mm/day in the San Antonio Bay system to 3.08 +/- 2.74 mm/day in the Corpus Christi Bay system. This wide variation was probably attributable to the small sample size. The mean growth rate for all recaptured black drum was 0.73 +/-0.25 mm/day. Size at tagging did not relate to growth rate. Monthly survival estimates for fish in all bays were 90.9 +/- 3.2% for red drum and 80.0 +/- 5.4% for black drum. A model assuming constant survival and recovery rates was selected as the best fit for both species because it was not significantly differnt (P > 0.05) from more complex models where one or both of the parameters were time specific. Monthly fishing mortality estimates for red drum were 1.0 +/- 0.2% for sport fishermen and 1.0 +/- 0.3% for commercial fishermen, assuming a 100% reporting rate. Monthly fishingen_US
dc.description.urihttp://gbic.tamug.edu/request.htmen_US
dc.geo-codeTexas coasten_US
dc.geo-codeGalveston Bayen_US
dc.history10/14/04 easen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.3/20045
dc.latitudeen_US
dc.locationGBIC Circulating Collectionen_US
dc.longitudeen_US
dc.notesen_US
dc.placeAustin, TXen_US
dc.publisherTexas Parks and Wildlife Department, Coastal Fisheries Branchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries227.00en_US
dc.relation.urien_US
dc.scaleen_US
dc.seriesManagement Data Series No. 1en_US
dc.subjectmarine fishen_US
dc.subjecttaggingen_US
dc.subjectgrowthen_US
dc.subjectlocal movementsen_US
dc.subjectred drumen_US
dc.subjectSciaenops ocellataen_US
dc.subjectblack drumen_US
dc.subjectPogonias cromisen_US
dc.subjectgulf flounderen_US
dc.subjectParalichthys albiguttaen_US
dc.subjectAtlantic croakeren_US
dc.subjectMicropogon undulatusen_US
dc.subjectsouthern flounderen_US
dc.subjectParalichthys lethostigmaen_US
dc.subjectblack drumen_US
dc.subjectsheepsheaden_US
dc.subjectArchosargus probatocephalusen_US
dc.subjectspotted seatrouten_US
dc.subjectCynoscion nebulosusen_US
dc.titleFish tagging in Texas Bays during November 1975- September 1976en_US
dc.typeBooken_US
dc.universityen_US
dc.vol-issueNo. 1en_US

Files