Browsing by Author "Texas Coastal Management Program"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Activity assessment routine social and economic component: user's guide(Research and Planning Consulants, 1978) Texas Coastal Management Program;The purpose of the Social and Economic Component of the Activity Assessment Routine (AAR) is to give local and state government officials and community leaders a systematic process for understanding and evaluating the environmental impact of the location or expansion of a major (industrial) facility in their area.Item Compilation of Draft Documents(Texas General Land Office, 1992-10) Texas Coastal Management ProgramDraft documents presented at a program meeting on October 30, 1992. Document titles are as follows: Inventory of Coastal Management Authorities; Public Education and Participation Strategy; Special Award Condition # 2 Critical Area Program; Special Award Condition #3 State Consistency Review Process; Special Condition #4 Coastal Management Program Organization and Structure; Special Award Condition #5 Resource Data Inventory; Special Award Condition #6 Uses Subject to Management; Special Award Condition #8 Coastal Management Program Planning Area; Special Award Condition #9 How Uses will be Managed.Item Ecological Attribute Alteration: Measurement and Evaluation: Activity Assessment Routine: Ecological Systems Component(RPC, Inc., 1978) Texas Coastal Management ProgramThis technical paper is intended to provide a more complete treatment of implicit principles and assumptions contained in the user's manual for the ecological systems component of the activity assessment routine. The ecological systems component (ESC) defines a method for evaluating changes in an ecosystem which may result from resource use and consumption. This paper begins by characterizing an ecosystem as an organized collection of attributes mutually dependent on energy exchange. The magnitude matrix with which altered energy flows are scaled is described in Chapter 4. The magnitude of an alteration is assessed somewhat differently for the two categories of attributes: discussion of conventions relevant to this distinction is provided in Chapter 5. However, effects on attributes are variable through time, and additional remarks concerning duration are included in Chapter 6. Finally, possible exceptions to the general guidelines for designating the direction of an effect are introduced in Chapter 7.Item Texas Coastal Management Program (CMP) Atlas(Texas General Land Office, 2000) Texas General Land Office; Texas Coastal Management ProgramNo abstract available.Item Texas Coastal Management Program: revised hearing draft appendix 3(Texas General Land Office, 1978) Texas Coastal Management Program; ;This appendix is an extract of draft proposed rules of the General Land Office and School Land Board. The Commissioner of the General Land Office intends to present these rules and others to the School Land Board for adoption by that agency. This extract includes those rules which are referenced in the main volume or are necessary to demonstrate the enforceability of policies which are included in the Texas Coastal Management Program as defined in the main volume. The full text of the proposed rules approved by the School Land Board will be published in the Texas Register. The rules as they appear in the Texas Register may differ in form and numbering, but there will be no significant difference in susbtance.Item Working Papers II - DRAFT(Texas Coastal Management Program, 1976-03) Texas Coastal Management ProgramIn its final pre-hearing form (to be printed in June), this report will be accompanied by five map plates. One map will depict the "natural areas of coastal waters," one will show the federally controlled lands and areas of national interest on the Texas coast, and three will picture "areas of particular concern"--including a regional overview, those areas nominated by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, and those nominated by the Bureau of Economic Geology of The University of Texas at Austin. The report will also contain an executive summary, which will be distributed to a much larger audience (about 10,000) than the full report.